Abstract ： Objective To evaluate the clinical validity of Physiological and Operative Severity Score for theenUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) in primary lung cancer patients undergoing surgery in order to get clinical treatment reference. Methods A total of 179 patients，with 124 males and 55 females，with primary lung cancer surgery between January 2007 and October 2010 were included in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Their age was 59.2±11.4 years．Before the surgery，POSSUM was used to each patient to rate the results and substituted the results into Copeland equation to calculate the predicted postoperative mortality and morbidity. The actual number of complications and death were calculated after surgery and the patients were divided into one group with postoperative complications and another group without postoperative complications. The physiological score and the operative risk score were compared between the two groups. Actual number of complications and death were compared with thenumber predicted by POSSUM respectively. The clinical factors related to the actual number of complications and death were analyzed. Results Among 179 patients， there were postoperative complications in 78 patients. The physiological score and the operative severity score were significantly higher in the group in whose complications occurred compared with those without complications (16.11±2.53 points versus 14.88±1.86 points for physiological score，P=0.000 ； 13.47±2.83 points versus 12.88±2.57 points for operative severity score，P=0.000). There was no statistical difference in complication between the predicted and actual number (65/179 versus 78/179，χ2=1.968，P=0.161). There was statistical difference in death between the predicted and actual number(12/179 versus 3/179，χ2=5.636，P=0.018).Univariable analysis revealed that 5 single factors were related to the complications， only hemoglobin was related to the death. Conclusion The POSSUM gives satisfactory prediction in morbidity rate but overrates the mortality rate in primary lung cancer patients undergoing surgery， and 5 single clinical factors show a better clinical value.
Objective To explore the value of combination APACHE II, Ranson with BalthazarCT Scoring System predicting the prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The relationship between APACHE II, Ranson, Balthazar CT scoring systems and mortality of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of West China Hospital from January 1st, 2007 to December 31st, 2008 was analyzed. Results There was statistical difference between high and low score groups in the APACHE II, Ranson, BalthazarCT scoring systems. Combination APACHE II, Ranson with Balthazar CT scoring system, there was statistical difference between high and low Balthazar CT score group both in APACHE II and Ranson scoring systems. Conclusion APACHE II, Ranson combined with Balthazar scoring systems can be used as a more important clinical reference in evaluating the diagnosis and prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis.
ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of Balthazar computed tomography severity index (CTSI), Modified computed tomography severity index (MCTSI) and extrapancreatic inflammation on CT (EPIC) in patients diagnosed as acute pancreatitis with organ dysfunction based on the revised Atlanta classification. MethodsThe clinical data of patients diagnosed as acute pancreatitis from December 2013 to January 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Four imaging score systems (CTSI, MCTSI, EPIC, and local complications) and two clinical score systems were assessed with ROC and AUC. Results①There were no statistical significances in the age, gender, time after onset of symptoms to CT scanning in 54 patients (P > 0.05).②CTSI, MCTSI, EPIC, and local complications were good independent predictors of organ dysfunction in the early phase (P < 0.05), while BISAP and NJSS were not (P > 0.05). ConclusionCT scoring systems can accurately evaluate organ dysfunction of acute pancreatitis in the early phase.
ObjectiveThe Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) model and its Portsmouth (P-POSSUM) modification are used extensively to predict post-operative mortality and morbidity in general surgery. The aim was to analysis the predictive value of these models in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. MethodsEligible articles were identified by searching such electronic databases as PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), Science Citation Index, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM from 1991 to October 2013. Each study was assessed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then data were extracted, pooled, and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis Version 2. ResultsTen studies were included. The morbidity analysis included five studies and 683 patients on POSSUM with a weighted O/E ratio 0.71 (95%CI 0.60 to 0.81). The mortality analysis included seven studies with 1 291 patients on POSSUM and six studies with 1 793 patients on P-POSSUM. Weighted O/E ratios for mortality were 0.42 (95%CI 0.27 to 0.57) for POSSUM and 0.74 (95%CI 0.53 to 0.95) for P-POSSUM. ConclusionPOSSUM significantly overestimates postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. Compared with the original POSSUM, P-POSSUM is more accurate for predicting post-operative mortality. Modifications to POSSUM and P-POSSUM are needed for audit in hepatobiliary surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS-28) score and analyze the feasibility of assessing the nursing workload by REMS score for critically wounded earthquake victims, in order to provide reference for rapid and effective resource allocation for earthquake victims. MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on 39 Lushan earthquake victims with their acute plysiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ scores higher than 25, who were directly transferred from the earthquake site to the Emergency Department of West China Hospital between April 20 and 27, 2013. Among them, there were 24 males and 15 females aged between 5 and 90 years old averaging (57.1±19.8) years. REMS score and TISS-28 score were calculated for each victim. The relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score was analyzed by correlation analysis and curve estimation including linear model, quadratic model, composite model, growth model, logarithm model, cubic model and exponential model. Then, we tried to find out the most suitable description for the relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score. ResultsThe Spearman correlation coefficient between the two score systems was 0.710 and the most suitable description for the relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score was logarithmic curve model. The formula was TISS=-5.946+4.467lnREMS. ConclusionREMS score can be applied as a nursing workload predicting tool for critically wounded victims in Lushan earthquake and it provides a guidance for rational allocation of health resources.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognosis of benign esophageal perforation by Pittsburgh scoring system (perforation severity scores, PSS) combined with co-disease index (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI).MethodsThirty patients with benign esophageal perforation from August 2016 to August 2018 in our hospital diagnosed by imaging or endoscopy were selected, including 14 males and 16 females, aged 68.660±10.072 years. After treatment, we retrospectively analyzed whether there was any complication in the course of treatment, the healing of esophageal perforation at discharge and the follow-up after discharge. And the patients were divided into a stable group (20 patients with no complication, clear healing of esophageal perforation at discharge or death during follow-up) and an unstable condition group (10 patients with complications, esophageal perforation at discharge or death during follow-up). Complete clinical data of all the patients were obtained and were able to be calculated by the scores of PSS and CCI scoring system. The difference of PSS and CCI scores between the two groups was compared, and the clinical value of PSS combined with CCI score in the prognosis of benign esophageal perforation was analyzed.ResultsIn the stable group, the PSS was 2.750±1.372 (95%CI 2.110 to 3.390), CCI score was 2.080±1.055 (95%CI 1.650 to 2.500) with a statistical difference between the two systems (P=0.000). In the unstable group, PSS was 7.300 ±1.829 (95%CI 7.300 to 8.120), CCI was 4.640±1.287 (95%CI 4.220 to 5.060) with a statistical difference between the two systems (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PSS and CCI scores in the prognostic evaluation of benign esophageal perforation was 0.982 and 0.870 respectively, which was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionEsophageal perforation is a dangerous condition. It is of great practical value to evaluate the condition of esophageal perforation by PSS and CCI scores.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and clinical application value of low attenuation areas (LAA) scoring system in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).MethodsA total of 380 patients with AECOPD were included. Clinical data including general information, laboratory examinations and treatments during hospitalization were collected. According to the high-resolution computed CT (HRCT) imaging performance, the patients were divided into bronchitis phenotype and emphysema phenotype. The clinical data between these two groups were compared to analyze the differences between different phenotypes and the feasibility of LAA scoring system.ResultsIn patients of bronchitis phenotype, the levels of body mass index, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and eosinophil counts on admission were higher than those of emphysema phenotype (P<0.05). Patients with emphysema phenotype had a higher proportion of male, a higher smoking index, higher cystatin C levels and lower bilirubin levels on admission (P<0.05), the rates of using mechanical ventilation and systemic glucocorticoids were higher as also (P<0.05). LAA scores had a positive correlation with the use of mechanical ventilation and systemic glucocorticoids and cystatin C levels, and a negative correlation with interleukin-6 levels (P<0.05).ConclusionsFor patients with AECOPD, using LAA scoring system to classify different phenotype through HRCT has relevant accuracy and clinical practicability. The LAA scoring system might help to evaluate the patient's condition and prognosis to a certain extent.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis (AP) complicated with pulmonary infection and to explore the value of BISAP, APACHEⅡ and CTSI scores combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) in early diagnosis and prognosis of AP complicated with pulmonary infection.MethodsFour hundreds and eighty-four cases of AP treated in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected. After screening, 460 cases were included as the study object, and the patients with pulmonary infection were classified as the infection group (n=114). Those without pulmonary infection were classified as the control group (n=346). The baseline data, clinical characteristics, laboratory test indexes, length of stay, hospitalization cost, and outcome of the two groups were collected, and the risk factors and early predictive indexes of pulmonary infection in patients with AP were analyzed.ResultsHospitalization days and expenses, outcome, fluid replacement within 24 hours, drinking, smoking, age, APACHEⅡ score, BISAP score, CTSI score, hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (ALB), CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), total bilirubin (TB), lymphocyte count, international standardized ratio (INR), blood glucose, and blood calcium, there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in BMI, sex, recurrence rate, fatty liver grade, proportion of patients with hypertension and diabetes between the two groups (P>0.05). The significant indexes of univariate analysis were included in multivariate regression analysis, the results showed that Hb≤120 g/L, CRP≥56 mg/L, PCT≥1.65 ng/mL, serum calcium≤2.01 mmol/L, BISAP score≥3, APACHEⅡ score≥8, CTSI score≥3, and drinking alcohol were independent risk factors of AP complicated with pulmonary infection. The working characteristic curve of the subjects showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of CRP, BISAP score, APACHEⅡ score and CTSI score were 0.846, 0.856, 0.882, 0.783, respectively, and the AUC of the four combined tests was 0.952. The AUC of the four combined tests was significantly higher than that of each single test (P<0.05).Conclusions The CRP level, Apache Ⅱ score, bisap score and CTSI score of AP patients with pulmonary infection are significantly higher, which are closely related to the severity and prognosis of AP patients with pulmonary infection. The combined detection of the four items has more predictive value than the single detection in the early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of AP complicated with pulmonary infection. Its application in clinic is of great significance to shorten the duration of hospitalization and reduce the cost of hospitalization and mortality.
ObjectiveTo investigate predictive value of a new blood biochemical scoring system (CPWAG scoring system) on severity and mortality of acute pancreatitis (AP).MethodsThe AP patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were collected, then were divided into severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) group and non-SAP group according to the latest Atlanta classification. The differences of clinical characteristics and related blood biochemical indicators between the SAP group and the non-SAP group were compared. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen blood biochemical risk indicators related to SAP. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to obtain the best cut-off value corresponding to the maximum Youden index of statistical significant risk factors and was assigned as 0 or 1 point according to different situations. At the same time, the pleural effusion of the BISAP score was included and assigned as 0 (yes) or 1 (no) point, then the CPWAG score was obtained by adding the point of the above indexes.The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of the CPWAG, BISAP, APACHEⅡ, CTSI, and Ranson scoring systems in predicting severity and death of AP patients were also compared.ResultsA total of 451 patients with AP were included in this study, including 85 patients with SAP and 366 patients with non-SAP. Compared with the non-SAP group, the etiology of AP was mainly biliary (P<0.05), with higher levels of white blood cell count (WBC), C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and glucose (P<0.05), greater red blood cell distribution width value (P<0.05), longer prothrombin time (PT) and hospital stay (P<0.05), lower albumin (ALB) and blood calcium levels (P<0.05), higher BISAP, APACHEⅡ, CTSI and Ranson points (P<0.05), and higher proportions of patients with pleural effusion, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and death (P<0.05) in the SAP group. The highest score of the CPWAG scoring system included CRP, PCT, WBC, ALB, glucose, blood calcium, and pleural effusion was 7. With the increase of CPWAG score, the proportion of SAP and death patients showed an increasing trend (P<0.001). The AUC of the CPWAG scoring system in predicting SAP was 0.866, which was higher than those of Ranson (AUC=0.722, Z=5.317, P<0.001), APACHEⅡ (AUC=0.706, Z=5.019, P<0.001), and CTSI (AUC=0.805, Z=1.962, P=0.005) scoring system, but which had no statistically significant difference as compared with the BISAP scoring system (AUC=0.819, Z=1.816, P=0.070). The AUC of the CPWAG scoring system in predicting death had a high ability (AUC=0.823), which had no significant differences as compared with the Ranson, APACHEⅡ, CTSI, and BISAP scoring systems (P>0.05).ConclusionThe CPWAG score is valuable in predicting the severity and mortality of AP patients, allowing accurate and early assessment of AP patients.
Objective The self-defined multidisciplinary (endocrinology, vascular surgery, and orthopedics) scoring system (EMO scoring system for short) was designed. The feasibility of the EMO scoring system to guide the proximal tibial transverse transport (TTT) for diabetic foot wounds was preliminarily explored. Methods Based on the current commonly used clinical criteria for diabetic foot judgment, expert consensus, guidelines, and related research progress in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds, combined with clinical experience, a set of EMO scoring systems including endocrinology, vascular surgery, and orthopedics was formulated. The criteria for selecting conservative treatment, TTT after baseline improvement, and TTT based on scoring results was proposed. A total of 56 patients with diabetic foot wounds who were admitted between September 2017 and July 2022 and met the selection criteria was taken as the study subjects. Among them, 28 patients were treated with TTT and 28 patients were treated conservatively. The patients were graded according to the EMO scoring system, the corresponding treatment methods were selected, and the actual treatment methods and results of the patients were compared. Results The EMO scoring system was formed through literature retrieval and clinical experiences. The system included three criteria, namely endocrinology (E), macrovascular disease (M), and orthopedics (O), which were divided into multiple subtypes according to the relevant evaluation items, and finally the diabetic foot wound was divided into 8 types, which correspondingly selected TTT, TTT after baseline improvement, and conservative treatment. All 56 patients were followed up for 12 months after treatment. Among them, the wound healing rate of the TTT group was 85.71% (24/28), which was higher than that of the conservative treatment group [53.57% (15/28)]. At 12 week after treatment, CT angiography showed that there were more small blood vessels in the wound and ipsilateral limb in TTT group than in the conservative treatment group. Based on the EMO scoring system, 14 of the 56 patients needed conservative treatment, 29 patients needed TTT, and 13 patients needed TTT after baseline improvement. Compared with the clinical data of the patients, the wound healing rate of the patients judged to be TTT was 75.86% (22/29), of which 21 cases were actually treated with TTT, and the healing rate was 90.48%; 8 patients were treated conservatively, and the healing rate was 37.50%. The wound healing rate of the patients judged to be conservative treatment was 92.86% (13/14), of which 1 case was actually treated with TTT, and the healing rate was 100%; 13 cases were treated conservatively, and the healing rate was 92.31%; 1 case experienced minor amputation. The wound healing rate of the patients judged to TTT after baseline improvement was only 30.77% (4/13), of which 6 cases were actually treated with TTT, and the healing rate was 66.67%; 7 cases were treated conservatively, and the healing rate was 0. Conclusion EMO scoring system can comprehensively evaluate the diabetic foot wounds, and make personalized judgment on whether TTT treatment is feasible, so as to improve the level of diabetic foot wound treatment and the prognosis of patients.